Link to video to watch the debate through: #MeToo: The Debate – Channel 5. Margaret Gardener speaks at 25:10 minutes (FASO input).
So, had four young men who were arrested after a group sex session at a student ball been found guilty of sex crimes, they would have been jailed for many years…
One of the hardest things a lot of people find to understand about False Allegations is what they say about the legal Justice system and how it is functioning. Often there are calls for new laws of checks to be put in place, or various “lessons to be learnt” when, in truth, the laws we have in the country – the laws that are meant to protect each and every one of us – are already in place. It is understandable to hear people say things like: “well, he must have done something wrong if they have charged him and taken him to court.”
The scariest thing is that unless people have personal experience of false allegations they genuinely don’t know that this is not t he case. It might be hard to imagine, but people genuinely are arrested, charged and even – in some terrible examples – convicted where there is no more than the testimony of the claimant (the correct term, as opposed to “victim”). In fact, in many case, and especially when the case is an historical case, there is no evidence that any crime was even committed. There is no broken window to show the vandalism; no missing car to show the theft; no burning building to show the arson; and no body or huge amount of bloody to show a murder. There’s nothing.
So people can be facing a trial that not only are they not guilty of, but one that never even happened. However, it is important to remember that FASO does not deny in any way that abuse does happen. Quiet the opposite, in fact. It worries us greatly that whilst the police waste their time entertaining yet another liar’s fantasy. there are other real victims who need their help.
We are supposed to live in a society that shares in a belief that all children should be protected from harm. But we are also supposed to be able to rely on the idea of being treated as “innocent until PROVEN guilty”. But in reality…this simply isn’t the case.
So, here’s an image to have some thought over. Match up the 4 terms with the 4 statements. Share your thoughts on what it might say not just about the issues of false allegations, but also how they work in hand with child protection. Remember, FASO believe in the support of ALL genuine victims of these terrible crimes against people of all ages.
AUGUST 7, 2014
The 13th National Miscarriage of Justice Day returns to it’s roots in Liverpool.
Saturday 11th October 2014
Liverpool John Moores University have kindly agreed to host the event in their John Foster Building.
John Foster Building,
80-90 Mount Pleasant,
All workshops and meetings are free and open to everyone opposed to miscarriages of justice. Donations to UAI welcome, to help cover costs. The following details will be updated as further confirmations become available, so please check back frequently and help raise awareness of the event in any way you can. A printable flyer will be available shortly when details are finalised.
10:00 Doors open 10:30 Morning Workshops begin
Starting an New Group
Documents and Disclosure
CCRC applications (CCRC representatives will be present)
13:00 Lunch Interval
A 1 hour related documentary will be shown while we break for teas, coffees, snacks and cakes.
14:00 Speakers confirmed so far include :-
Ashleigh Towers – Ashleigh campaigns on behalf of her brother Jordan Towers wrongly convicted under Joint Enterprise for murder, for the past 7 years working hard to keep Jordan’s case alive in the system. His case is currently under review for a second time with the CCRC, due to her hard efforts a BBC documentary has been commissioned on Jordan’s case as a result of which a follow up documentary regarding police interviews in JE cases. Ashleigh also lobbied the Government on the yourGov website in relation to Joint Enterprise which played a crucial part in Lord Ouseley raising the subject with Parliament which in effect played a significant role in the justice select committee coming together to debate the Joint Enterprise doctrine. You can read about Jordan’s case here – http://justice4jordan.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/
Carol Toal – Carol Toal will be speaking about her son’s case. Sean Toal was convicted of a murder in which all of the forensic evidence points to another identifiable individual. Most people will agree that providing the evidence is sufficient, credible, strong enough, and independently corroborated, the passage of time shouldn’t interfere with someone being brought to justice if they’ve committed a crime – the same should apply when exculpatory evidence is discovered post conviction in securing the release of an innocent person, particularly when that same evidence strongly suggests the identity of the actual perpetrator. The passage of time isn’t a good reason to exclude evidence from appeal. Sean’s case is currently being reviewed by the SCCRC. http://justice4sean.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/
Daniel Macarthur – With the new Hillsborough inquest underway and unlikely to be concluded until next year, his talk will by necessity be restricted to the campaigning aspect of seeking justice for the 96 and the hardships and difficulties faced along the way. United Against Injustice would like to extend a hand of solidarity with the families and friends of the 96 as they endure this, hopefully just and final, quest for the truth.
Ross Patel -Mr Patel is a technology forensic consultant listed on the ‘UK Register of Expert Witnesses’ (Law Society / Sweet & Maxwell) and vetted member of the ‘Expert Witness Institute’ (EWI) and ‘Academy of Experts’ (AoE), specialising in the analysis of computing and data storage evidence. He is the inventor of the CELL ANALYST; a revolutionary toolkit for telecommunication investigations across GSM/UMTS infrastructures, as used by a number of leading analysts throughout the UK and Europe for advanced cell site analysis investigations, surveys and mapping. His area of expertise is extensively used in various investigations today, in particular Joint Enterprise, fraud, conspiracy etc. You can read more about him here – http://afentisdigitalforensics.blogspot.co.uk/p/about.html
CCRC Representative (Name and position to be confirmed) A representative from the CCRC will also speak in the afternoon session. Further details to be confirmed shortly.
Inquest – Inquest will be sending a representative to speak in the afternoon session at this year’s meeting. This will bring unity between different forms of injustice, talking about the similarities in difficulties faced which will help demonstrate the systemic nature of these problems. They’ll also bring to the table their experience in getting public figures and authorities on board, which will hopefully help you understand how to expand the circle of support for your own causes.
More precise information will be available shortly due to annual leave.
Student Innocence Projects – The Innocence Network UK has stopped operating as a network and providing services to student innocence projects. There are still however many innocence projects across the country who intend to carry on. A student will talk of the future of those projects and how they intend to carry on providing a new, hopefully improved, service. Dr Andrew Green has written on the subject here – UK Innocence Projects: a bright future
Further speakers to add when confirmed.
5:00 Meeting concludes followed by some light entertainment in a more social setting.
Miscarriage of Justice Day Evening Entertainment
The Casa Bar, which is where the first ever meeting to discuss the formation of United Against Injustice, has been secured as a venue for entertainment after this year’s Miscarriage of Justice Day meeting on October 11th. The Casa Bar is just yards away from the LJMU John Foster Building.
The Casa Bar, 29 Hope St, Liverpool, Merseyside L1 9BQ
MC Graham Robinson
If you’d like to take the mic, or have someone read one of your pieces for you, please contact Graham Robinson or Joy France (links are facebook pages). Alternatively, you can email Billy Middleton (email@example.com) and he will forward them your information.
Details of the full judgement can be seen here : http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/B1.html
I am delighted to let you know that the book Can’t Explain is now available for pre-order on Amazon with an official release date of 31st March 2014.
The e-book will also be available by this date and possibly by the end of this week. Your review has been included in full within the book at the end of the story and also a snippet has been included on the Amazon web page.
We are planning to advertise further via various media, e.g. radio, newspapers (local and national), but are obviously not guaranteed of success, but will be doing all we can in terms of promotion.
Once again, thanks for help and support with this publication and let’s hope the intended goals of raising general public awareness of Parental Alienation are met, with a view to getting things changed for the better.
We would like to take you up on your kind offer of advertising the book on your web site and the passing of information to other organisations. I see no reason why this can’t start now.
Luke Mathews co-author.
Sir James Munby attacked workers in Bristol who didn’t explain themselves.
They did not tell a couple why their two children were being taken from them.
They breach a court order in doing so – which could carry a jail term in future.
Two interesting events coming up shortly:
The National Safeguarding Conference on the 23rd October 2013 at the Welcome Centre in Coventry.
FASO’s very own Margaret Gardener will be contributing to the open floor debate session.
For more information please download a PDF leaflet.
Progressing Prisoners Maintaining Innocence on the 16th November 2013 at the Archbishop Amigo Hall, Lambeth Rd. SE1.
Workshops, marketplace and debate with the opening speaker being Christine Glenn, Chief Parole Commissioner for Northern Ireland. For more information please download a PDF leaflet.
By Neil Puffett, Thursday 21 March 2013
An independent panel of experts will be created to vet the decisions of local safeguarding children board chairs under revised safeguarding guidance published today.
Children’s minister Edward Timpson said the guidance will help professionals to keep children safe.
The overhauled Working Together guidance, which comes into effect on 15 April, reveals that the new national panel will advise local safeguarding children boards (LSCBs) on when a serious case review should take place and when they are required to publish reports.
The guidance says LSCBs should “have regard” to the panel’s advice when making decisions about serious case reviews.
Meanwhile, local authority social workers will be expected to conduct an assessment of a child and make a decision about the type of response that is required within one working day of a referral being received.
The guidance also removes the requirement to have separate initial and core assessments and the 10-day timescale for completing initial assessments.
However, it retains the timescale of 45 working days as the maximum time for an assessment to be completed.
The government has said that removing the requirement for separate initial and core assessments will make assessment a “continuous process? rather than “stop start?
Children’s minister Edward Timpson said the guidance will support professionals to take the “right decisions and the right action to promote the welfare of children and keep them safe?
“Today’s guidance makes absolutely clear the core legal requirements on all organisations and individuals working with children to promote their welfare and keep them safe,?he said.
“We expect professionals to use the guidance, along with their expertise and judgment, to tailor support to individual children and families.”
Eileen Munro, whose review of child protection prompted the revision of the guidance, said the changes mark an “important step?in reforming the “confusing, prescriptive culture that has ruled professionals working with children?
“One of the most important recommendations in my report ?to have guidance focusing on the core legal rules ?was so those working to protect the welfare and needs of children can start to regain control of their practice while working within a clear framework so that different agencies know what to expect of each other.
“Today’s announcement should give all those reforming frontline work with children the clarity and confidence to take those reforms forward.?/p>
Debbie Jones, president of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services, said returning decision making to those who are professionally accountable, rather than following process and prescriptive procedures, is the right thing to do.
However she expressed concerns over the plan for an expert panel to monitor LSCBs, describing it as “an unnecessary bureaucratic intervention?that could interfere with the independence of LSCB chairs.
Joe Brown wrote: 22 Mar 2013
This review will increase bureaucracy for LSCBs, reduces their independence and removes critical; guidance offered previously within Appendix 5.
This will mean nervous decision-making, buck-passing and the creation of a blame culture.
Another Tory fudge, leaving issues of role and responsibilities of employers and LADO wide open to interpretation.
No mention of the important roles duties and responsibilities in terms for voluntary, sporting groups.
Unhelpful and rubbish!!